Press Reporter news service
Chandigarh, Might 2
An accused is just not entitled to discretionary reduction of bail, merely on the bottom that he has been behind the bars since July 24 final 12 months, a neighborhood court docket right here noticed whereas dismissing the bail utility of Hallo Majra resident Surdeep, who has been accused of attacking an individual with knives and sticks.
In view of the intense allegations in opposition to the applicant, the court docket is of the opinion that at this stage, the applicant is just not entitled to the concession of bail, mentioned Further Classes Choose Dr Rajneesh.
Surdeep was arrested by the police on July 24, 2020 following an FIR beneath Part 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 341 and 326 of IPC at Sector 31 police station right here.
The FIR was based mostly on the grievance of Pawan Kumar.
The complainant had alleged that he and his good friend Mandeep, aka Guli, have been attacked after they have been roaming in Hallo Majra about 6 pm on June 7, 2020.
Kumar alleged that Viru, aka Kancha, Monu and Dalip, together with three different boys, armed with knives and sticks attacked them and when the individuals within the neighborhood began gathering on the website, they fled from the spot.
Throughout the course of investigation, accused Dalip, Viru and Vishal, aka Vikshi, have been arrested on June 10, 2020. Monu and Surdeep, aka Rokra, have been held on July 24, 2020.
After finishing the investigation, a challan was offered within the court docket on July 29, 2020.
Opposing the bail, the general public prosecutor mentioned medical report revealed each the victims suffered accidents and accused Surdeep was additionally a member of the group armed with lethal weapons.
The prosecution mentioned if Surdeep was given the bail there was a chance that he would possibly hamper the method of trial by influencing or threatening the witnesses.
Surdeep’s counsel, in the meantime, mentioned his consumer had been behind the bars since July 24, 2020.
He has been falsely implicated within the current case. Neither his identify is talked about within the FIR nor has any restoration been comprised of him, the counsel added.
After listening to the arguments, the court docket mentioned little question, challan was offered within the court docket and trial was pending, however the accused was not entitled to discretionary reduction of bail.
Reasonably, the potential of his hampering the method of trial by influences or threatening the witnesses and likewise indulging into such like different offences might not be dominated out if allowed the bail, the court docket noticed.