Tuesday, 7 December, 2021
HomeChandigarhChandigarh court frames charges against 4 in firing incident at GMCH-32

Chandigarh court frames charges against 4 in firing incident at GMCH-32

Ramkrishan Upadhyay

Press Reporter News Service

Chandigarh, November 16

Jaibir Singh, Further Classes Decide, Chandigarh, has framed prices in opposition to 4 accused Kamalpreet Singh, Bhavjit Singh, Dilpreet Singh and Baljeet Singh, alias Baljit Choudhary, in a two-year-old firing incident that passed off reverse the Authorities Medical Faculty and Hospital (GMCH), Sector 32, Chandigarh.

The fees have been framed in opposition to the accused for the offences punishable beneath Sections 147, 148, 149 and 307 of the IPC.

The police had registered an FIR within the case on a criticism of Jagtar Singh, a resident of Punjab, who alleged that 5 individuals attacked him and opened fireplace at him when he was standing in entrance of the GMCH-32 on January 10, 2020.

Jagtar mentioned he, alongside along with his pal Sameer Bhat, came visiting his pal Lovepreet Singh, who was admitted to the hospital. He, together with Bhat, was standing close to the emergency when 4 to 5 males attacked them shouting that Bhat can be eradicated. Earlier than fleeing, the accused opened fireplace at him. He hid behind his automotive whereas a passerby, recognized as Gurdyal Singh of Himachal Pradesh, acquired a bullet harm within the arm and was admitted to the GMCH-32.

Jagtar mentioned Bhat had a standoff with some individuals over a TikTok video. The police had registered a case beneath Sections 147, 148, 149 and 307 of the IPC and Sections 25, 27, 54 and 59 of the Arms Act on the Sector 34 police station. In the course of the course of investigation, three used cartridges and a automotive with 5 bullet marks have been seized from the spot.

“After going by way of the report beneath Part 173 of the CrPC and its accompanied paperwork, a prima facie case punishable beneath Sections 147, 148, 149 and 307 of the IPC is made out in opposition to the accused. In view of the observations of the Supreme Courtroom expressed in case titled as Omwati v/s State (Delhi) Administration, the detailed circumstances exhibiting existence of prima facie case in opposition to the accused for the offences in query aren’t required to be set out whereas framing cost. They’ve pleaded not responsible to the cost and claimed trial,” mentioned the courtroom within the order.

The courtroom has mounted December 6 as the subsequent date of listening to to look at prosecution witnesses.

Most Popular

English English हिन्दी हिन्दी ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ