Thursday, 29 July, 2021
Home Latest Stories On Backward Classes List, Supreme Court Turns Down Centre's Review Plea

On Backward Classes List, Supreme Court Turns Down Centre's Review Plea

The centre had filed a petition within the Supreme Court docket over energy so as to add communities to SEBC record

New Delhi:

The ability that lies solely with the President so as to add a group to the Socially and Educationally Backward Courses (SEBC) record can’t be given to states, the Supreme Court docket has stated, dismissing a petition to evaluate an earlier ruling.

A five-judge structure bench dismissed the centre’s plea that was filed in Might, days after the Supreme Court docket dominated that solely the President has the facility to determine and add a group to the SEBC record.

“The grounds taken within the evaluate petition don’t fall inside the restricted floor on which evaluate petition will be thought of. The assorted grounds taken within the evaluate petition have already been handled in the primary judgment. We don’t discover any enough floor to entertain this evaluate petition. The evaluate petition is dismissed,” the court docket stated in an order posted on its web site on Thursday.

The Supreme Court docket on Might 5 upheld the 102nd Constitutional (Modification) Act that led to the formation of the Nationwide Fee for Backward Courses (NCBC) and took away states’ energy so as to add communities to the SEBC record for reservation in jobs and admissions.

The centre in its petition stated the facility of states so as to add communities within the SEBC record cannot be scrapped.

“As supplied within the Supreme Court docket Guidelines, 2013, a Evaluation Petition for evaluate of the judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court docket has been filed by the Union of India on 13th Might, 2021,” the Social Justice and Empowerment Ministry stated in a press release.

On Might 5, a five-judge Structure bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan, of their 4 separate verdicts, was unanimous on different key points such because the Maratha quota legislation was invalid and the 1992 Mandal judgement, capping complete reservation to 50 per cent, didn’t want a relook or reference to bigger bench.

Justice S Ravindra Bhat wrote a 132-page verdict and Justices L Nageswara Rao and Hemant Gupta, of their separate judgements, concurred with Justice Bhat and his reasoning in holding that states have misplaced their energy to determine SEBC beneath their territory the after 102nd Constitutional (Modification) Act.

The states can, by their present mechanisms, and even statutory commissions, can solely make recommendations to the President or the fee, for “inclusion, exclusion or modification of castes or communities” within the SEBC record, Justice Bhat stated.

The 102nd Structure (Modification) Act of 2018 inserted Articles 338B, which offers with the construction, duties and powers of the Nationwide Fee for Backward Courses, and 342A, which offers with the facility of the President so as to add a specific caste as SEBC and energy of parliament to alter the record.

Most Popular

Ayushmann Khurrana on his next with Abhishek Kapoor: It is a beautiful, progressive love story

By: Leisure Desk | New Delhi | Revealed: July 29, 2020 8:43:23 am Ayushmann Khurrana and Abhishek Kapoor movie will launch subsequent 12...

Poll Body Seeks Detailed Report On Kamal Nath's "Item" Remark

Kamal Nath referred to lady minister as an "merchandise", sparking an argument. (File)New Delhi: The Election Fee of India (ECI) has sought an in...

Who is Dhanashree Verma?

By: Leisure Desk | New Delhi | Revealed: August 8, 2020 6:42:23 pm Dhanashree Verma is a YouTuber and dancer by career. (Picture:...
English English हिन्दी हिन्दी ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ