The person who was photographed pointing a gun at a Delhi Police head constable through the Northeast Delhi riots in 2019 has utilized for bail in a homicide case on Monday, claiming that the investigation was a “sham” and was finished to “instil worry in Muslims”.
Sharukh Pathan moved a Delhi courtroom for bail in reference to the homicide of a person known as Vinod Kumar on February 24, through the riots.
Pathan’s advocate, Khalid Akhtar, instructed the courtroom that the police, as a substitute of investigating Kumar’s homicide, investigated the accidents obtained by three males, together with two law enforcement officials.
“That it’s pertinent to say that the investigation on this current case was slightly a fishing investigation because the FIR was lodged to research a totally completely different case and it has filed a chargesheet in a really completely different case,” the bail plea learn.
Pathan is additionally accused within the case associated to pointing a gun at head constable Deepak Dahiya. He was arrested on March 3, 2020, and is presently lodged within the Tihar Jail.
“Investigating officers has surreptitiously investigated a unique case in order that the malicious prosecution wouldn’t get pissed off by delay in lodging FIR/criticism,” advocate Akhtar instructed the courtroom.
Pathan’s lawyer argued that the investigation within the current case was carried out with none witness complaints. He argued that the police had “planted victims, witnesses, proof, testimonials merely to persecute and create a way of worry within the hearts and minds of the minorities to not increase their voices towards unconstitutional enactments.”
His lawyer instructed the courtroom that all the investigation was a “sham merely to harass the accused individuals and to instil worry amongst Muslims, as a way to deter them from elevating their voices towards arbitrary and unconstitutional enactment of CAA and NRC”.
“That these erring officers in connivance with political forces have performed biased investigations and made indiscriminate arrests to swimsuit their narrative to the extent of deceptive the courtroom, by making deliberate false and exaggerated statements figuring out and believing full effectively that such statements may very well be detrimental to basic rights of such individuals within the courtroom of legislation,” his plea acknowledged.