Boards have been put in the middle of the road across the city, double attitude towards the campaign
Sirsa Newsnetwork The city council has taken a dual attitude towards the removal of encroachment campaign. Due to which there is a lot of anger against the council among the people. Actually, the functioning of the city council is such that it is not being able to respond to it. Small sign boards of shopkeepers are picked up in the city, but silence has been maintained by the city council in the matter of life-size sign boards installed at various places in the city. Many boards have been put in the middle of the road by the city council. The amount spent on which is also tax paid by the general public.
Hardly anyone has any objection to the removal of encroachment campaign of the city council, but the manner in which the campaign is being run, there is anger about it. Firstly, the attitude of the employees and officials going to the market is as if the shopkeeper is a Pakistani. There is a competition to confiscate the goods kept outside the shops as if free goods are kept. After this the attitude of these employees is dishonest. The shopkeepers are misbehaved, words are not even limited. For this reason, there is anger among the shopkeepers against the officials of the city council.
The second big thing is that when the city council does not tolerate even small boards of shopkeepers. Then the officials of the city council should answer that in which category the boards of councilors and VIPs, which are put up by the council at various places in the city, come under which category. Even if the boards with the names of councilors come in the middle of the road, even if the board of a person belonging to a political party creates disturbance in the traffic, the city council will not pay attention to that. The boards put up by the city council are life sized and permanent. These boards put up with public money do not cause disruption in traffic? The city council should first remove these boards and it should be recovered from the people responsible for the wastage of money spent on them.
shopkeepers facing recession
For two years, the shopkeepers who have been hit by the lockdown due to Corona, expected the ointment from the government that there would be some relief announcements. But the way the discriminatory policy is being worked by the officials of the Municipal Council Sirsa, the shopkeepers are getting double hurt. In the name of encroachment by the city council, a notice of fine up to Rs 2000 is being sent. This notice is like an injury to the shopkeepers who are facing recession. There is no customer in the market anyway. During the day, the rent of the shop, the cost of electricity bill does not come out. In such a situation, shopkeepers are fed up with the dual attitude of the city council.
Get Nehru Park free from encroachment
The city council wants to remove the encroachment. If there is a craze to follow the rules, then they should first get the Nehru Park free from encroachers. A brick of the huge building that has been erected by Shri Rama Club Charitable Trust in Nehru Park should be removed and shown? Illegal construction has been done by the trust in Nehru Park. Enjoyed the greenery. Construction continues today. But the city council officials do not see this? Why? The officers of the city council are powerful, can lift the boards of small shopkeepers, but cannot shake even a single brick of illegal occupation at the place of the city council? When will the city council officials get rid of their dual attitude? Either everyone should be captured under the campaign or no one should be harassed?
Photo: Nehru Park
Challenge open for the district administration?
There is an open challenge to the district administration in case of encroachment on the road space of 10 to 15 feet near the main post office. Show the city council team by putting their hands here. Encroachment has been done here by making a boundary wall. Many officers came and many left. No one from here showed the courage to remove the encroachment? Whenever the campaign was carried out in the city, it came to a standstill near the post office. The officers of the city council who are proud of the encroachment removal campaign, the officials who are flaunting by removing the small boards of the shopkeepers, should they remove the encroachment by building a boundary wall near the post office? Otherwise stop harassing the shopkeepers in the name of encroachment removal campaign. This dual attitude will not last long. The city council will have to run the campaign without any discrimination. Encroachment from one end to the other on any market or road should be removed. Hardly anyone would mind it.